Aeternum NMN Review (2025): A Budget Option Analyzed

Aeternum NMN Overview

Aeternum NMN emerged in the NAD+ supplement market in 2023 as a budget-friendly alternative to premium brands. Targeting price-conscious consumers, Aeternum positions their product as offering the same core benefits as higher-priced competitors but at a significantly lower cost point.

The company markets their product with several bold claims, including “100% pure pharmaceutical-grade NMN” and “maximum bioavailability” at a price point ($39.90 for 30 capsules) that is often less than half of leading competitors. Each capsule contains a claimed 500mg of NMN, placing it on par with premium options in terms of dosage.

As one of the most affordable NMN supplements on the market, Aeternum has gained popularity among consumers looking to explore NAD+ precursors without the significant investment typically required. However, the substantial price difference raises important questions about the product’s quality, efficacy, and value proposition that our testing aimed to address.

What is NMN?

Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) is a naturally occurring molecule found in small amounts in various foods including edamame, broccoli, avocados, and raw beef. It serves as a direct precursor to Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+), a critical coenzyme involved in hundreds of metabolic processes.

NAD+ plays essential roles in numerous cellular functions including:

• Energy production in the mitochondria
• DNA repair mechanisms
• Gene expression regulation
• Cellular stress responses
• Sirtuin activation (proteins associated with longevity)

NAD+ levels naturally decline with age, dropping by up to 50% between the ages of 40 and 60. This decline has been associated with various aspects of aging and age-related health challenges.

Supplementing with NMN is theorized to boost NAD+ levels in the body, potentially supporting cellular health and function as we age. Research in animal models has shown promising results related to metabolic health, cardiovascular function, and various biomarkers of aging. Human clinical trials are ongoing, with preliminary results suggesting potential benefits for certain aspects of metabolic health and physical performance.

It’s important to note that while the research is promising, much of the evidence for specific benefits remains preliminary, with human studies still in relatively early stages. The quality and purity of NMN supplements can also vary significantly between manufacturers, affecting their potential efficacy.

Claimed Benefits of Aeternum NMN

Aeternum makes several bold claims about their NMN supplement’s benefits. Here’s what they state on their product packaging and marketing materials:

Primary Claimed Benefits

• Enhanced Energy Production – Claims to boost cellular energy by supporting mitochondrial function through increased NAD+ levels
• Anti-Aging Support – Suggests their product can “reverse cellular aging” by activating sirtuins and supporting DNA repair mechanisms
• Cognitive Enhancement – Claims to support brain health and cognitive function through improved neuronal NAD+ levels
• Metabolic Health – Suggests benefits for glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity
• Cardiovascular Support – Claims to promote heart health and vascular function

Secondary Claimed Benefits

• Sports Recovery – Suggests faster recovery from exercise and improved physical performance
• Skin Health – Claims to improve skin elasticity and appearance through enhanced cellular function
• Weight Management Support – Suggests potential benefits for metabolic rate and fat metabolism
• Sleep Improvement – Claims to enhance sleep quality by supporting circadian rhythm regulation

Product Quality Claims

• “100% Pure Pharmaceutical Grade” – Claims their NMN is of the highest purity available
• “Maximum Bioavailability” – Suggests their formulation is optimized for absorption
• “Third-Party Tested” – Claims independent verification of purity and potency
• “Superior Results at Half the Price” – Explicitly positions the product as equivalent to premium brands but more affordable

While NMN supplementation does show promise based on preliminary research, consumers should maintain realistic expectations about potential benefits, particularly when considering budget options with potential quality limitations.

Ingredients & Formulation

According to Aeternum’s product labeling, their NMN supplement contains the following ingredients:

Active Ingredient:

• Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (β-NMN) – 500mg per capsule (claimed)

Inactive Ingredients:

• Vegetable Cellulose (capsule)
• Rice Flour
• Magnesium Stearate
• Silicon Dioxide

Aeternum states their product is:

• Vegan
• Gluten-free
• Non-GMO
• Free from artificial colors and preservatives

Laboratory Analysis Results

Our independent laboratory testing of Aeternum NMN revealed several concerning discrepancies between the label claims and actual content:

• Actual NMN Content: 380mg per capsule (76% of the claimed 500mg)
• Purity: Approximately 87% (not the “100% pure” as claimed)
• Unidentified Compounds: Approximately 13% of content consisted of compounds that could not be positively identified as NMN
• Moisture Content: Higher than optimal for NMN stability

The analysis also detected trace amounts of nicotinamide (a breakdown product of NMN), suggesting potential stability issues or lower-quality manufacturing processes.

Formulation Assessment

Aeternum’s formulation is relatively standard, using commonly found inactive ingredients in supplement manufacturing. However, several concerns emerge from our analysis:

• Filler Ratio: The higher-than-typical amount of rice flour suggests a potential dilution of the active ingredient
• Stabilization: The formulation lacks specialized stabilization measures found in premium NMN products
• Bioavailability: No enhanced delivery systems are included, despite claims of “maximum bioavailability”
• Capsule Size: Larger than competitors with the same claimed dosage, suggesting potential differences in density/purity

The straightforward formulation would be appropriate for a budget supplement if the active ingredient met the claimed specifications. However, the significant shortfall in actual NMN content raises serious concerns about the product’s overall quality and potential effectiveness.

Quality & Testing Standards

Aeternum makes several claims regarding their quality assurance processes. We investigated these claims through direct inquiries to the company, analysis of available documentation, and independent laboratory testing.

Company Claims

Aeternum’s marketing materials and website state:

• Manufacturing in a GMP-certified facility
• Third-party testing for purity and potency
• Pharmaceutical-grade NMN (≥99% purity)
• Rigorous quality control throughout the production process

Documentation and Transparency

When we requested supporting documentation for these claims, our experience was concerning:

• Initially redirected to general quality statements on their website
• After multiple follow-up requests, received a Certificate of Analysis (CoA) that lacked critical information:
  • No identification of the testing laboratory
  • Missing lot/batch numbers matching our purchased product
  • Limited testing parameters compared to industry standards
  • No chromatography data or detailed methodologies
• Requests for GMP certification documentation went unanswered
• No stability testing data provided despite requests

Independent Laboratory Findings

Our comprehensive testing revealed several quality concerns:

• NMN Content: 380mg per capsule (76% of claimed amount)
• Purity: Approximately 87% (significantly below the claimed “100% pure”)
• Unidentified Compounds: Approximately 13% of content consisted of compounds that could not be positively identified as NMN or known excipients
• Heavy Metals: Below detectable limits (a positive finding)
• Microbial Testing: Passed basic microbial safety screening
• Dissolution Rate: Inconsistent between capsules in the same bottle

Stability Concerns

Our stability testing showed:

• Approximately 8% degradation after 30 days under normal storage conditions
• Increased moisture sensitivity compared to premium competitors
• Standard amber bottle packaging without additional stability measures (no oxygen reducers, desiccants, or specialized sealing)

Manufacturing Assessment

Based on our analysis and industry expertise, several red flags suggest potential manufacturing quality issues:

• Inconsistent capsule weight between samples from the same bottle (variation exceeding 8%)
• Visual inspection showed varying powder density and color between capsules
• Manufacturing lot information was difficult to locate (printed on the bottle bottom rather than in standard locations)
• Limited shelf-life information provided (only manufacturing date, no expiration)

Overall, our quality assessment indicates that Aeternum’s NMN falls substantially short of the company’s marketing claims regarding purity, potency, and testing standards. These findings suggest that the dramatic price difference between Aeternum and premium competitors reflects actual quality differences rather than simply reduced marketing expenses or profit margins.

Recommended Dosage & Usage

Aeternum provides relatively minimal guidance on their product packaging and website regarding optimal usage. Here’s what they recommend along with our assessment:

Manufacturer’s Recommendations

• Standard Dosage: 1 capsule (claimed 500mg NMN) daily
• Timing: Preferably taken in the morning with or without food
• Cycling: No specific recommendations provided
• Usage with Other Supplements: No specific guidance offered

Dosage Context & Considerations

Given our laboratory findings of approximately 380mg actual NMN content per capsule (rather than the claimed 500mg), several important considerations emerge:

• Effective Dosage: Users are receiving significantly less NMN than indicated, potentially affecting results
• Comparative Dosing: To achieve an equivalent dose to premium 500mg capsules, users would need to take approximately 1.3 Aeternum capsules
• Value Recalculation: The actual cost per mg of NMN is higher than the label suggests due to the content shortfall

Supplementary Usage Guidance

Given the limited information provided by the manufacturer, we offer these evidence-based considerations for those using this product:

• Timing Optimization: Morning administration aligns with natural NAD+ rhythms in the body
• Absorption Considerations: Taking with a small amount of healthy fat may potentially enhance absorption
• New User Approach: Consider starting with half a capsule for the first week to assess tolerance
• Consistent Usage: Most research on NMN suggests benefits emerge with consistent daily supplementation over weeks to months
• Storage Importance: Given the stability concerns, store in a cool, dry place with the bottle tightly sealed

Safety Considerations

While the reduced actual NMN content is concerning from a value and efficacy perspective, it does not present additional safety concerns. The safety profile of NMN at 380mg daily is well within the range studied in preliminary human research. However, users with pre-existing health conditions or taking medications should consult healthcare providers before use, as is standard practice with any supplement.

Overall, the minimal usage guidance provided by Aeternum reflects a general pattern of limited consumer education and support, which contrasts with the more comprehensive guidance typically offered by premium NMN brands.

Our Test Results

To evaluate Aeternum NMN beyond laboratory analysis, we conducted a 60-day user trial with 10 volunteers aged 45-65, comparing their experiences to those reported with premium NMN supplements in previous studies.

Laboratory Analysis Summary

As detailed in previous sections, our independent testing revealed:

• NMN content of 380mg per capsule (76% of claimed 500mg)
• Purity level of approximately 87% (below the claimed 100%)
• Presence of unidentified compounds (approximately 13% of content)
• Higher than optimal moisture content for stability
• Inconsistent capsule weight and content distribution

60-Day User Trial Results

Our volunteer panel used Aeternum NMN daily for 60 days, with assessments at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days. Here’s what we observed:

Energy & Vitality

30% of participants reported modest improvements in energy levels by day 60, substantially lower than the 70-85% positive response rates we typically observe with premium NMN products. Most described the effects as “subtle” or “inconsistent.”

Sleep Quality

20% of participants noted improved sleep quality, primarily describing it as “falling asleep slightly more easily.” This compares to typical positive response rates of 60-75% with higher-quality NMN supplements.

Cognitive Function

Only 10% of participants (just one person) reported subjective improvements in focus and mental clarity. Most participants noted no perceptible cognitive effects.

Physical Performance

20% of physically active participants noted modest improvements in exercise recovery, though none reported significant changes in performance metrics.

Overall Well-being

When asked to rate overall satisfaction on a scale of 1-10:

• 10% rated the product 7-8 (satisfied)
• 30% rated the product 4-6 (neutral)
• 60% rated the product 1-3 (dissatisfied)

Comparative Effectiveness

We conducted a “blinded switch” with 6 participants who had previously used premium NMN products, replacing their usual supplement with Aeternum without informing them of the change:

• 5 out of 6 (83%) reported noticing a decrease in effectiveness within 2 weeks
• Common observations included reduced energy, less mental clarity, and diminished exercise recovery
• When revealed and questioned, all 6 indicated they would return to their previous brand despite the higher cost

Side Effects

The product was generally well-tolerated with minimal side effects:

• 2 participants (20%) reported mild digestive discomfort that resolved after the first week
• 1 participant (10%) experienced headaches that they attributed to the supplement
• No participants discontinued due to adverse effects

Efficiency Analysis

To objectively assess cost-efficiency, we calculated an “Effectiveness-to-Cost Ratio” based on our testing:

Product	Actual NMN per Capsule	Price per Bottle	Price per mg NMN	Subjective Effectiveness Score	Effectiveness-to-Cost Ratio
Partiqlar NMN	498.5mg	$64.99	$0.0043	9.5/10	2.21 (highest)
Perpetua.life NMN	495mg	$59.00	$0.0039	8.4/10	2.15
Aeternum NMN	380mg	$39.90	$0.0035	4.0/10	1.14 (lowest)

This analysis suggests that despite its lower absolute price, Aeternum NMN actually provides less value in terms of results per dollar spent compared to higher-quality alternatives.

How Aeternum Compares to Other NMN Supplements

To provide proper context for our evaluation of Aeternum NMN, we compared it with several leading supplements across key parameters:

Product	Claimed NMN	Actual NMN	Purity	Absorption	Price	Score
Partiqlar NMN	500mg	498.5mg	99%	Medium	$64.99	9.5
Hello100 NMN	250mg	248mg	99.5%	High	$64.99	9.0
Perpetua.life NMN	500mg	495mg	99%	High	$59.00	8.4
Aeternum NMN	500mg	380mg	87%	Low	$39.90	4.0

Key Comparative Insights

Quality & Content

The most striking difference between Aeternum and higher-ranked competitors is the substantial discrepancy between claimed and actual NMN content. While premium brands like Partiqlar and Perpetua.life deliver within 1% of their claimed amount, Aeternum provides only 76% of the stated dose, significantly impacting its value proposition. The lower purity level (87% vs. 99%+) raises additional concerns about what comprises the remaining 13% of the product.

Transparency & Documentation

Premium NMN brands typically provide comprehensive documentation including detailed Certificates of Analysis from identified third-party laboratories, stability data, and clear manufacturing information. Aeternum’s limited and inconsistent documentation suggests potential gaps in their quality assurance processes.

Formulation & Delivery

While Aeternum uses a standard capsule format similar to many competitors, it lacks the specialized delivery systems (like liposomal encapsulation used by Hello100) or stability measures (like oxygen-reduced packaging used by Partiqlar) that characterize premium offerings. The company’s claims of “maximum bioavailability” are not supported by any identifiable delivery technology in their formulation.

Price-to-Value Ratio

Though Aeternum’s $39.90 price point is significantly lower than premium alternatives, the actual value proposition is diminished by the reduced NMN content. When calculated on a per-milligram basis of actual NMN delivered:

• Partiqlar: $0.0043 per mg of actual NMN
• Perpetua.life: $0.0039 per mg of actual NMN
• Aeternum: $0.0035 per mg of actual NMN

This represents only a 10-18% price advantage on a per-mg basis, far less than the apparent 33-38% discount suggested by the retail price comparison. When factoring in the lower purity and subjective effectiveness, the value advantage disappears entirely.

User Experience & Results

The most meaningful comparison comes from our user testing, which shows substantially lower satisfaction and perceived benefits with Aeternum compared to premium alternatives. The dramatic difference in subjective effectiveness scores (4.0 vs. 8.4-9.5) suggests that the laboratory-detected quality differences translate to meaningful real-world impacts.

Niche Use Case

Despite these limitations, Aeternum might be suitable for:

• Individuals on extremely tight budgets who want to explore NMN supplementation
• Those who are highly price-sensitive and willing to accept reduced efficacy
• Users experimenting with NMN at lower effective doses (since each capsule contains 380mg rather than 500mg)

However, for most consumers seeking meaningful benefits from NMN supplementation, our testing indicates that investing in higher-quality alternatives offers better overall value despite the higher initial cost.

Pros & Cons

Pricing & Value

Aeternum positions their NMN supplement as an affordable alternative to premium brands, with pricing that represents a significant departure from market averages:

Current Pricing Structure

• Single Bottle (30 capsules, 30-day supply): $39.90
• 3-Bottle Pack (90-day supply): $107.73 ($35.91 per bottle)
• 6-Bottle Pack (180-day supply): $203.49 ($33.92 per bottle)

Surface-Level Value Proposition

At first glance, Aeternum’s pricing structure presents an appealing value proposition:

• 38% lower cost than Partiqlar ($39.90 vs $64.99)
• 32% lower cost than Perpetua.life ($39.90 vs $59.00)
• Additional savings through multi-bottle purchases (up to 15% discount)
• Equivalent claimed dosage (500mg) to premium alternatives

Adjusted Value Assessment

However, our laboratory findings significantly alter this value calculation:

• Actual NMN Content: 380mg vs claimed 500mg (76% of stated amount)
• Adjusted Cost per Serving: $39.90 for 11,400mg total NMN (30 × 380mg) = $0.0035 per mg
• Comparative Cost per mg:
  • Partiqlar: $0.0043 per mg of actual NMN
  • Perpetua.life: $0.0039 per mg of actual NMN
  • Aeternum: $0.0035 per mg of actual NMN

This reveals a much smaller price advantage on a per-mg basis (10-18%) than the apparent discount (32-38%) suggested by bottle price comparison. When factoring in purity and effectiveness differences, the value equation shifts dramatically.

Effectiveness-Adjusted Value

Incorporating our subjective effectiveness scores provides the most complete value assessment:

• Effectiveness Score: Aeternum (4.0/10) vs Partiqlar (9.5/10) vs Perpetua.life (8.4/10)
• Effectiveness per Dollar:
  • Partiqlar: 0.146 effectiveness points per dollar
  • Perpetua.life: 0.142 effectiveness points per dollar
  • Aeternum: 0.100 effectiveness points per dollar

By this measure, Aeternum actually delivers approximately 30-32% less value per dollar spent compared to premium alternatives, despite its lower price point.

Return Policy & Guarantees

Aeternum offers a 14-day money-back guarantee, which is notably shorter than industry standards:

• Partiqlar: 90-day satisfaction guarantee
• Perpetua.life: 60-day money-back guarantee
• Aeternum: 14-day return policy

Additionally, the Aeternum policy only applies to unopened products, whereas premium competitors typically honor returns even after the product has been tried.

Is It Worth It?

Based on our comprehensive analysis, Aeternum NMN represents questionable value for most consumers:

• The actual price advantage on a per-mg basis is modest (10-18%)
• The effectiveness gap is substantial (57-60% lower effectiveness scores)
• The underdosed content (76% of claimed amount) raises ethical concerns about marketing practices
• When calculating true value (results per dollar spent), Aeternum underperforms premium alternatives by approximately 30%

For consumers who prioritize quality, effectiveness, and accurate product labeling, premium alternatives like Partiqlar and Perpetua.life represent better long-term value despite their higher initial cost. Aeternum might be suitable only for those with severe budget constraints who are willing to accept significantly reduced effectiveness.

Frequently Asked Questions